By Soumya Ranjan 
Operation Sindoor: The Indian strike follows two weeks after the Pahalgam terror attack, which killed 26 people, primarily tourists, in the Baisran hill station of Jammu and Kashmir. India had attributed the attack to Pakistan.
Operation Sindoor, code name:
India launched late-night attacks on terrorist camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir, successfully hitting nine targets in the exercise, the government announced early on Wednesday.
Two weeks have passed since the Pahalgam terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir’s Baisran hill station, which claimed the lives of 26 people, primarily tourists. India had attributed the attack to Pakistan.
According to reports, Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who had vowed to exact revenge for the Pahalgam terror attack, kept a close eye on the operation all night. The strikes follow days of heightened hostilities and a decline in India-Pakistan diplomatic ties.
Why is it called Sindoor?
Under the code name “Operation Sindoor,” the mission’s goal was to kill senior terror leaders from Lashkar-e-Taiba in Muridke and Jaish-e-Mohammed in Bahawalpur.
The operation’s name, Sindoor, has a special meaning. Married Hindu women frequently apply vermillion, which is known in Hindi as “sindoor,” to their foreheads.
It appears that the operation’s name is a reference to retaliation for the way terrorists killed 26 people—mostly tourists—in the Baisaran valley of Pahalgam on April 22. According to reports, the men who perished in the Pahalgam terror attack were all asked for their names before being put to death.
Operation Sindoor, which took place on Wednesday night, is purportedly a reference to the fact that only men were singled out in Pahalgam based on their faith before being killed.
Following the savage Pahalgam terrorist attack, which claimed the lives of 25 Indians and one Nepali national, these actions were taken. India said in a statement, “We are fulfilling our promise that those responsible for this attack will face consequences.
Recall that “Operation Bandar” was the code name for the Indian Air Force’s February 26, 2019, airstrike on Balakot. The February 14, 2019, terror attack in Pulwama prompted this operation. A Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM) training camp in Balakot, Pakistan, was the target of the airstrikes.
The strategic importance?
India has “struck three places from the air”: Bhawalpur in Pakistan’s Punjab Province, Kotli, and Muzaffarabad in Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir, according to Inter-Services Public Relations, the military’s media wing.
Bahawalpur is the base of the Masood Azhar-led Jaish-e-Mohammed, while Muridke is the headquarters of the Lashkar-e-Taiba, which is thought to have been responsible for the Pahalgam attack.
[…] Rohit Sharma has announced his retirement from Test cricket to play one-day cricket instead What is India’s symbolic message behind its nighttime strike on Pakistani terror bases under … On day four, Nani’s HIT 3 hits a century! Sumeet Bagadia suggests five shares to […]
The recent operation by India against terrorist camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir is a significant move in the ongoing conflict. It’s clear that the government is taking a strong stance against terrorism, especially after the tragic Pahalgam attack. The choice of the name “Operation Sindoor” is symbolic and seems to carry a deep message of retribution. However, I wonder if such operations will truly deter future attacks or escalate tensions further. The focus on targeting specific terror groups is commendable, but what about the broader diplomatic implications? How does this align with long-term peace efforts between the two nations? It’s crucial to consider the human cost on both sides and whether military action alone can bring lasting solutions. What are your thoughts on the effectiveness of such operations in curbing terrorism?
The recent “Operation Sindoor” seems to be a bold and calculated response to the Pahalgam terror attack. It’s interesting how the operation’s name holds such cultural significance, tying it to the idea of retribution and justice. I wonder if the choice of “Sindoor” was meant to send a specific message or if it was purely symbolic. The fact that the operation targeted senior terror leaders is commendable, but do you think this will deter future attacks or escalate tensions further? It’s concerning how the Pahalgam terrorists specifically targeted individuals based on their faith—such atrocities must never be repeated. While India’s swift action is justified, how do you think Pakistan will respond to this? Lastly, do you believe diplomatic ties can be restored after such heightened hostilities?
Interesting read. The operation’s name, “Sindoor,” seems deeply symbolic, tying cultural significance to a military action. It’s striking how the government is framing this as a direct response to the Pahalgam attack, emphasizing the targeting of men based on their faith. The use of such symbolism might resonate strongly with the public, but does it risk escalating tensions further? The mention of “Operation Bandar” also raises questions about the long-term strategy—are these strikes effective in curbing terrorism, or do they perpetuate a cycle of violence? It’s hard not to wonder how Pakistan will respond to this latest escalation. Do you think this approach will lead to a de-escalation, or are we seeing the beginning of a prolonged conflict? The focus on retaliation is clear, but what about the broader implications for regional stability?
[…] Rohit Sharma has announced his retirement from Test cricket to play one-day cricket instead What is India’s symbolic message behind its nighttime strike on Pakistani terror bases under … On day four, Nani’s HIT 3 hits a century! Sumeet Bagadia suggests five shares to […]